ls turbo or ls vtec?????help
02-16-2003, 07:07 AM
#12
R E U P Gang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Popping tensioners on 64E
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please refer to SCC...stovk LS in hatch on boost and hondata running 11s....."the only thing holding it back from low 11's and high 10's are the 440cc injectors, so 880's are on the way"
02-16-2003, 09:30 AM
#15
DESTROYS DONUTS !!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: the seed has sprouted.
Posts: 13,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by zappas
ok...fnd me one about a ls/vtec in a hatch w/boost...
ok...fnd me one about a ls/vtec in a hatch w/boost...
02-16-2003, 12:54 PM
#16
Awesome.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 13,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LS/VTEC+turbo=fast. So some people think it's unreliable, well it can be...but shit happens. It's proven to be quick, and that's what's convincing me at the moment. Built LS/VTEC+turbo+CRX=10s...and that was 2 years ago.
02-16-2003, 07:27 PM
#17
been around awhile.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 757
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-16-2003, 10:40 PM
#18
UTRASP33D
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its all a money issue, and what you want... for the price of a turbo you could have a built ls/vtec/nos, to many people feel because they read it in a magazine they can make it happen just as easy, its all about whats available to you. but do what you want, do alot of reasearch for yourself. asking people is gonna get you no where. fuck it, in my opinion sell the ls motor, and do a b20/vtec... turbo or nos
02-16-2003, 10:45 PM
#19
UTRASP33D
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by _burn_
dont do lsvtec nomatter what. theres a reason honda didnt make that engine.....matting something that lives off high rpms to something that thrives at low torque and bigger displacment is stupid and BAD engine geometry.
go ls turbo please...
dont do lsvtec nomatter what. theres a reason honda didnt make that engine.....matting something that lives off high rpms to something that thrives at low torque and bigger displacment is stupid and BAD engine geometry.
go ls turbo please...
02-17-2003, 10:05 AM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: hampton
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
put it this way....A Ls redlines at 6,800-7000rpms..A GSR or Si red lines at 8,200-or 9,000 rpms with chip....Now without building that LS up it wont be able to handle the high rev for that long,before it starts breaking shit ....Cause that Ls has never in its life seen 8,200rpms and taking it there is dangerous with out building the block up, And getting all the oil inlets switched to ones off a Si or GSR so that it will be oiled properly..If not the stock ls ones won't inject enough oil and it will start to burn up the block and pistons....
Im just going on what it said off the import performance page...
It also says there possible to build but need to be built the right (all work done by a machine shop) to get them to run and last for ever like stock honda engines are known for..
Im just going on what it said off the import performance page...
It also says there possible to build but need to be built the right (all work done by a machine shop) to get them to run and last for ever like stock honda engines are known for..
Last edited by T-Hybrid; 02-17-2003 at 10:09 AM.